Planview-bloggen

Din väg till smidighet i affärsverksamheten

Produkter & Verktyg

Why the Spring Tool Suite is building on Eclipse

Publicerad By Mik Kersten

There have been some questions about whether the upcoming Spring Tool Suite (STS) will support other IDEs, such as IntelliJ IDEA. Rod Johnson and I recently answered some related questions on InfoQ, but the answer to this one is still evolving, so please consider sharing your thoughts on it. In choosing an IDE integration strategy for the Spring Tool Suite, we could either go breadth first and do multiple IDEs at once, or focus on one. A few years back we chose the breadth-first approach with the AspectJ IDE support. This time around the decision to go depth-first was easy because we knew we needed an IDE platform which had the openness and modularity required to support the extensions we have planned, and which was already adopted by a majority of the developers using Spring. There was also the key need to leverage Mylyn’s Task-Focused UI and the Spring IDE, which are at the heart of this effort. At this time, the ecosystem of components and user communities needed to support the Spring Tool Suite exists only on Eclipse. Where does this leave the IDEA and other IDE users?

The good news is that the frameworks that STS will be building on and improving are open source projects that are part of Eclipse and Spring. As we previously demonstrated with the AspectJ compiler and structure model, core framework components that are packaged as Eclipse OSGi bundles can be used from within other IDEs including IDEA and NetBeans. For example, while IDEA already has some neat support for things like Spring AOP, they will be able to reuse our upcoming STS efforts in providing a canonical model of Spring application structure. If you are a user interested in support for your IDE, consider commenting here or on Adrian’s blog, be sure suggest this to your vendor or raise an enhancement request is raised with the corresponding project of interest (e.g. Spring IDE, Mylyn). For example, there have recently been requests to support Mylyn in IDEA. As stated on the mylyn-dev list, I see the reuse of core models as a very positive thing. While there will be plenty of room for closed source differentiation on top of the frameworks that we are contributing to, the frameworks will continue to be open source and designed for reuse, which will help ensure that any developers building on Spring get to see a consistent and comprehensive model of their application within their IDE.

Relaterade inlägg

Skrivet av Mik Kersten

Mik Kersten började sin karriär som forskare på Xerox PARC där han skapade den första aspektorienterade utvecklingsmiljön. Han var sedan pionjär i integrationen av utvecklingsverktyg med Agile och DevOps som en del av sin doktorsexamen i datavetenskap vid University of British Columbia. Mik grundade Tasktop utifrån den forskningen och har skrivit över en miljon rader öppen källkod som fortfarande används idag, och han har tagit sju framgångsrika produkter med öppen källkod och kommersiella produkter till marknaden. Miks erfarenheter av att arbeta med några av de största digitala omvandlingarna i världen har fått honom att identifiera den kritiska bristen på kontakt mellan företagsledare och tekniker. Sedan dess har Mik arbetat med att skapa nya verktyg och ett nytt ramverk - Flow Framework™ - för att koppla samman nätverk för värdeskapande av programvara och möjliggöra övergången från projekt till produkt. Mik bor med sin familj i Vancouver, Kanada, och reser världen över för att dela med sig av sin vision om att förändra hur programvara byggs. Han är författare till Project To Product, en bok som hjälper IT-organisationer att överleva och blomstra i programvarans tidsålder.